Posted by Editor on January 21st, 2009
Posted In:
Budget Deficit,
Consumers,
Economy,
Gasoline,
Infrastructure,
Local Government,
Main Street,
Obama Administration,
Politicians,
Recession,
State Government,
Taxes,
U.S. Government
I know, I know. One of President Obama’s campaign promises was a tax cut for Main Street. Tax credits of up to $500 per person or $1,000 per family, and the elimination of income tax for seniors making less than $50,000 a year, from what I recall.
Well guess what? There’s a pretty good argument to be made that your taxes are going up anyway. Howard Gold wrote on the MarketWatch website last week:
Sometime in the next couple of years, you are likely to pay higher taxes — and it’s not for the reasons you think.
Sure, the Bush tax cuts will almost certainly expire in 2011, virtually guaranteeing higher marginal tax rates for top earners. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., is pushing to end them even sooner. And tax rates on capital gains and dividends may move up as well.
But President-elect Obama, faced with the biggest financial and economic crisis since the Great Depression, has pledged to go slowly on tax hikes, which he fears would take consumer demand off life support and put it in the morgue. He’s made some tax cuts a cornerstone of an economic-stimulus package Congress will debate in coming weeks.
No, the real danger to your wallets comes much closer to home — from cash-strapped states and municipalities, which are in their worst shape fiscally in decades.
Though they may resist at first, governors and state legislatures could be forced to raise income taxes, sales taxes, state university tuitions, transit fees and whatever else will help pay the freight.
That may mute the impact of any federal stimulus package, because if one government takes while another gives, you’ll still have less money to spend at the mall.
If your mall hasn’t gone under, right? Just how bad are finances at the state and local government level? Gold pointed out:
The situation is dire. The recession and the housing crash have landed body blows to local governments, severely reducing tax revenues. The National Governors Association projects fiscal 2009 budget shortfalls may reach $60 billion, and fiscal 2010 deficits could top $80 billion.
The Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, a Washington, D.C.-based liberal think tank that focuses on state and local finances, says: “Combined budget gaps for the remainder of the fiscal year and state fiscal years 2010 and 2011 are estimated to total more than $350 billion.”
FREE PUBLICATIONS for Finance Professionals
Sounds pretty serious. And as a result, local bodies of government are starting to slash spending. But will it be enough to prevent higher taxes? From the MarketWatch piece:
California has imposed furloughs on state workers and may cut funding of K-12 education by $5 billion amid a mind-boggling, $42 billion budget gap by the middle of next year. Teachers in South Carolina face salary freezes. Nevada has increased premiums on children’s health care. Florida, with an elderly population that tops 4 million, is considering cuts in Medicaid reimbursements to nursing homes.
And where budget cuts come, tax hikes are sure to follow.
Truth is, the hole is just too big to fill by budget cuts alone without decimating services on which the voting public has come to rely. President Obama’s proposed stimulus package can provide some relief, but it won’t cover the whole shortfall.
Further, if the economy remains as weak for as long as expected, tax revenue could slip even further while states face greater demand for services from the newly unemployed and the working poor.
Plus, state pension funds have racked up an estimated $865 billion in losses because of the stock market crash, and they could require taxpayer funding.
Looks like some areas of the country are further along in the process already. Gold noted:
So, it’s no surprise we’ve seen some tax hikes bandied about already. California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger has proposed boosting and expanding the state’s sales tax for three years, while Democratic legislators there want to impose a “temporary” income-tax surcharge of 2.5%.
In New York, Gov. David Paterson has requested 137 new tax and fee increases, including extending state sales taxes and imposing a new tax on iTunes songs and non-diet sodas. So, if you want to have a Coke while you’re downloading the latest from Jay-Z or Radiohead, it’ll cost you.
And the New York Times’ Kate Galbraith reported last week:
Several states are considering the rare step of raising gasoline taxes to help fill growing budget gaps and potholed roads.
Politicians in California, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Illinois and Oregon, for example, are introducing bills that would raise gasoline taxes for road and bridge repair, as state legislatures around the country begin their new sessions…
State lawmakers clearly see an opportunity to push through a tax. The recent sharp drop in gasoline prices, to less than half of last summer’s high of more than $4 a gallon, means that drivers may be less hesitant to pay slightly higher prices.
I wonder how long it will take before higher state income taxes come into play?
Hold onto your wallets, folks.

Sources:
“The tax time bomb is ticking”
Howard Gold
MarketWatch, January 15, 2009
“Some States in a Pinch May Raise Gasoline Tax”
Kate Galbraith
New York Times, January 16, 2009
Sphere: Related Content