Boom2Bust.com

Goldman Sachs: Half The World’s Economy Threatened By Recession

Talk about an attention-grabber. Yesterday, Bloomberg’s Simon Kennedy wrote:

Goldman Sachs Group Inc. said countries that account for half of the world’s economy face a recession a year after the credit crisis began.

The U.S., Japan, the 15-nation euro area and the U.K. are “either in recession or face significant recession risks in the months ahead,” Goldman’s London-based international economist Binit Patel said in a report to clients today…

“Continued robust, albeit slowing, growth in China and the rest of the emerging markets” will deliver world growth of 3.6 percent next year after 3.9 percent in 2008, said Patel, who estimates emerging markets account for the other 50 percent of the world economy.

Bloomberg’s Kennedy added:

A year since the U.S. housing slump sparked about $500 billion in credit market losses for banks globally, the world’s largest economies are all stumbling as rising borrowing costs combine with record commodity prices to sap growth. The U.S. is close to a recession and France, Germany and Japan all contracted in the second quarter.

“And The Winners Are…”

Source:

“Goldman Sachs Says Half of the World Economy Faces Recession”
Simon Kennedy
Bloomberg, August 21, 2008

Congress Approves National Colosseum

Not really. But Capitol Hill politicians might as well allocate funds to build one, complete with chariot races and gladiators to keep us happy, considering the way they’re pandering to the masses these days. When Congress only has a 20% approval rating (Gallup), what else would you expect? Something like what happened today. Hoping to sooth the economic pain (and gain the electoral support) of Joe Six-Pack and Suzy Soccer Mom, both the U.S. Senate and House of Representatives, in a direct challenge to President Bush, voted to temporarily halt the shipment of thousands of barrels of oil a day into the government’s emergency reserve. The Strategic Petroleum Reserve, a system of underground salt domes on the Gulf Coast, was created by the U.S. government in the seventies as a precaution against major interruptions of oil supplies. With 701 million barrels in storage, it is currently 97% full, yet the equivalent of only two months of oil imports.

The Senate voted 97 to 1 in favor of suspending the shipments, which average about 70,000 barrels a day, until the end of the 2008. Only Senator Wayne Allard of Colorado voted against the measure. Presidential hopefuls Barack Obama and Hillary Rodham Clinton also voted to halt the shipments as well. John McCain was not present for the vote. Mirroring the same bipartisan support as in the Senate, the House voted 385 to 25 in favor of halting the program.

For some time now, Congress has wanted to tinker with the SPR, jawboning on and on about how curbing deliveries to and/or drawing from the emergency reserve (by the way, what part of “emergency” don’t you get?) can ease tight oil supplies, curb market speculation, and possibly lower crude oil prices. Case in point. MSNBC’s John Schoen wrote back on May 19, 2004 (that’s right, 4 years ago):

With oil prices stuck above $40 a barrel, attention has turned to the U.S. Strategic Petroleum Reserve, a vast stockpile of oil stored underground that the U.S. continues to add to. While Democrats call for releasing some of those reserves to help ease oil prices, President Bush Wednesday repeated his long-standing position that the stockpile should only be used in the event of a critical cutoff of fuel needed to maintain the country’s national defense…

“Since the price of oil is so closely tied to inventory levels, filling the SPR under these market conditions both depletes private sector inventories and pushes up prices for America’s consumers,” said Sen. Carl Levin, D-Mich., in a floor speech in April defending an amendment to defer SPR purchases.

More recently, New York Democratic Sen. Charles Schumer has introduced an amendment to draw 1 million barrels a day from the reserve for the next 30 days.

“Joey, do you like movies about gladiators?”

And Congress’ assertions that curbing shipments to and/or drawing from the SPR could help with our supply problems, dampen speculation, and lower oil prices? Wrong, wrong, and wrong, according to the experts (or, at least, people who know what they’re talking about). Regarding the supply problem, the 70,000 barrels that are being sent to the reserve on a daily basis represents only 0.3% of the 20 million barrels consumed by Americans each and every day. 0.3%? Can anyone tell me how this could possibly help alleviate tight supplies? Regarding the perception that high oil prices are caused by speculators, legendary energy investor T. Boone Pickens told attendees at the Oklahoma State University’s Energy Conference on April 23:

Only 5 percent of oil is in the commodity pool. If you did run it up, it would be briefly. Speculators cannot move it that much.

He would know. Finally, a number of politicians believe (or want us to believe) that halting shipments and even drawing from the SPR will somehow lower oil prices. CNN Money’s Steve Hargreaves wrote today:

A statement from Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., said it could bring down gas prices by as much as 24 cents a gallon.

Or so she claims. The CNN Money staff writer also wrote:

The U.S. Energy Information Administration predicts oil prices would fall by only about $2 a barrel - or shave 4 to 5 cents a gallon off the price of gas - if the president suspended deliveries to the SPR.

“It’s a very small amount” of oil going into the reserve, said EIA oil market analyst Doug MacIntyre. “And it’s very transparent to the market.”

Should I believe House Speaker Pelosi or the EIA? Tough call, right?

Here’s something to think about. A possible explanation for the high price of crude oil is that global demand is running at 87 million barrels per day, while the global oil supply is at 85 million barrels per day. Furthermore, while older oil fields are starting to go dry, no suitable replacements are being found. Finally, even though the U.S. economy is slowing, for every 1 barrel of reduced American demand there are 14 barrels of increased demand from developing countries like China, India, and Brazil.

Oh, but this just in…

“Middle East Oil Cut Off By Coordinated Attacks Throughout Region” and “Gulf Oil Infrastructure Destroyed By Category 5 Hurricane”

Well done. Thanks for saving me that nickel.

Sources:

“Senate votes to halt oil reserve shipments”
H. Josef Hebert
Associated Press, May 13, 2008

“House votes to stop adding to oil stockpile”
Tom Doggett
Reuters (UK), May 13, 2008

“Debate flares over strategic oil stockpiles”
John W. Schoen
MSNBC, May 19, 2004

“Oil stockpile a drop in the bucket”
Steve Hargreaves
CNN Money, May 13, 2008

“Pickens: Oil to go to $150 a barrel”
Jerry Shottenkirk
Journal Record, April 24, 2008

Who’s To Blame For The High Price Of Oil?

I read the following the other day in a grocery store publication on Chicago’s northwest side. Regarding the high cost of oil and gasoline, the bureau chief of the paper wrote:

Whew! What is the answer? I think we should contact our elected officials, both state and national, and let them know we, the taxpayers, need some relief. Yes, I know about Bush’s economic stimulus package that is on the way- but I don’t want to put it all in my gas tank.

There’s no use arguing with most Americans over who’s to blame for high oil and gasoline prices. In their minds, “Big Oil” is the culprit, with a dash of President Bush, his oil buddies, and every level of government sprinkled in for good measure. But before you forward on that e-mail about a “gas station holiday” to five of your friends, consider this: Could it be possible that the high price of crude oil is mainly due to the basic principle of supply-and-demand? Just a thought. Bloomberg’s Mark Shenk wrote today:

China, India, Russia and the Middle East for the first time will consume more crude oil than the U.S., burning 20.67 million barrels a day this year, an increase of 4.4 percent, according to the International Energy Agency in Paris.

And here in the good old US of A?

U.S. demand will contract 2 percent to 20.38 million barrels daily, the IEA says.

Shenk noted that economic growth in China and India of more than 8%, coupled with increasing car ownership among the countries’ combined populations of 2.45 billion people, will more than compensate for declining demand in the United States. According to the IEA, global oil use will increase 2% this year largely because of emerging market growth.

Regarding the topic of car ownership, China’s passenger car sales jumped 22% to 6.3 million units sold last year. Reuters’ Joe Mcdonald reported on the Chinese auto sector today, and wrote:

Auto sales in China are booming, with analysts and automakers forecasting growth at 15-20 percent this year. But demand for the biggest vehicles is even stronger, with sales of luxury cars and SUVs expected to surge by 40-45 percent…

“Chinese buyers typically like bigger cars and they have the resources to go for them,” said Tim Dunne, J.D. Power’s director of Asia-Pacific market intelligence.

Source: China Daily

Mike Wittner, head of oil research at Societe Generale SA in London, told Bloomberg:

Does the U.S. matter anymore? Has the U.S. mattered for the last few years? It is debatable. As far as the oil market is concerned, demand growth is going to be continued to be driven by China and the Middle East.

Still feel like contacting your elected officials?

Sources:

“Emerging Market Oil Use Exceeds U.S. as Prices Rise (Update2)”
Mark Shenk
Bloomberg, April 21, 2008

“Gas guzzlers a hit in China, where car sales are booming”
Joe Mcdonald
Reuters, April 21, 2008

Banks May Write Down Additional $300 Billion

Yesterday, global strategy consulting firm Oliver Wyman said in a new study that an additional $300 billion in write-downs related to the U.S. subprime mortgage meltdown may be announced by banks before the crisis is over. Back on January 18 I noted that write-downs had already surpassed $100 billion. In a press release picked up by Yahoo! Finance yesterday, John Colas, Managing Director and head of the North American Corporate Strategy Practice at Oliver Wyman, said:

The credit crisis is unlikely to resolve itself before the end of this year. We also see strong likelihood of price corrections in emerging markets and this combination will extend the value loss and turbulence witnessed in 2007.

The management consultancy said in its “State of the Financial Services Industry” report:

We expect a stormy 2008. While governments, central banks and regulators scramble to address the aftermath of the sub-prime fallout, several other crises are mounting.

These other disruptions include:
• A significant slowdown in European real estate markets, especially in Spain and the UK
• The continued weakening of the U.S. dollar
• A collapse in commodity prices
• A fall in Chinese and Indian stocks

The financial services industry should expect “turbulent conditions for 2008 and beyond.” Oliver Wyman predicted that American banks are especially at risk. From its 2008 report:

North American financial services firms will have a tough year. Market uncertainty, combined with further write-downs and expected home-price and loan-volume declines, implies more squeezes on earnings. Banks most likely will have to increase loan-loss reserves.

In North America last year, the financial sector lost 13% in market value, second only to Japan. In contrast to the United States, the value of financial companies in Canada grew 12%.

For the first time since 2002, the global market value of the industry fell, according to the annual report. Controlling for exchange rates, the industry lost 7% of its market value last year. While $300 to $400 billion was gained in red-hot emerging markets last year, financial institutions lost more than $1 trillion in mature economies.

Morgan Stanley Asia’s Chairman Issues U.S. Recession Warning

Morgan Stanley Asia’s chairman, Stephen Roach, spoke to Sky News earlier today while visiting Australia and warned that while the U.S. economy is entering a recession, the Federal Reserve, along with the rest of the world, doesn’t appear to grasp its significance. While the Fed cut interest rates the last time they met, Roach feels their work is far from done. He said:

They will move again, most assuredly. The US is going into a recession, they’ve a lot more work to do. They could cut their policy short term interest rate by one to 1.5 percentage points over the next nine to 12 months.

During the interview, Roach spoke about the indifference of the global economy to the prospect of an economic recession in the United States. He warned:

There is a view that the world has somehow decoupled from the American growth engine. I think that view will turn out to be dead wrong and this is a global event with consequences for Asia and Australia.

The head of Morgan Stanley Asia also told Sky News that he didn’t believe growing demand from India and China will be able to “save the global economy.” He explained:

The US is a US$9.5 trillion consumer. China is a US$1 trillion consumer. India’s a US$650 billion consumer. Mathematically, it is almost impossible for the young dynamic consumers of China and India to fill the void that would be left by what is likely to be a significant shortfall of US consumer demand.

Back in a November 2 post, I discussed Roach’s views on “decoupling,” which he shared in a speech given in Mumbai, India:

I think the thing that worries me the most, and this is where I would really underscore the point for you in India, is that equity markets in this region, including your own, are discounting this optimistic, rosy scenario called decoupling. There is the strong belief that because the US has slowed so far, and Asia hasn’t, that any further slowdown will leave Asia unscathed. Think about it for a second. The slowing that’s occurred in the US right now has been in homebuilding activity. It’s America’s least global sector. You stop building a house in America, there’s almost no impact on Asian exports to the US. The slowing that will be coming over the next year will be in the consumer demand sector, which is America’s most global sector. So, we are going to see the US slowdown go from a domestically driven to a globally driven slowdown. I am sorry, as bullish as I am about Asia, Asia will not be an oasis of prosperity in a softer global demand climate. To the extent that emerging market equities are buyers of the global decoupling thesis, including in your own market right here, I think there could be a significant correction in emerging market equities that certainly could hit the Indian stock market quite hard.

Roach is well-known on Wall Street as a perennial “bear” on the U.S. economy. In November 2004 (while still Morgan Stanley’s chief economist), he attended a meeting with a select group of fund managers and shocked the audience with his observation that the U.S. had no better than a 10% chance of avoiding an economic “Armageddon.”

Yale’s Shiller Warns Of Major Global Correction

Somehow, I missed this story. Didn’t see it in the mainstream financial media, as it was probably deemed too gloom-and-doom to print. On November 18, ArabianBusiness.com talked about this year’s Dubai International Financial Centre (DIFC) Week. At the gathering, Robert Shiller, the Stanley B. Resor Professor of Economics at Yale University and author of the New York Times bestseller Irrational Exuberance, warned that a sharp downward correction is due in the global markets as real estate, stocks and energy soar to record highs. You may recall that in his bestselling book, Shiller waned that the U.S. stock market of the late nineties had become a bubble that would eventually pop. These past few years, he told anyone who would listen that the U.S. housing boom that came on the heels of the bust on Wall Street also shared the characteristics of a bubble.

According to the website, Dr. Shiller told attendees that while emerging markets like China, India, and Brazil continue to grow, speculative “bubbles” are appearing in the global markets, which could pop and cause a major global recession. He explained:

Perhaps we have gotten a little too confident in the global economic growth. The problem is high oil, stock and real estate prices. I believe that a substantial part is speculative bubble thinking. We have gotten too confident of the prices in these markets.

The global credit crunch has curtailed the lending and borrowing frenzy that fueled price run-ups in energy, stocks, and real estate. As a result, the markets could face significant corrections ahead. Professor Shiller said, “The unwinding of these markets is the most serious risk facing these markets today.”

Sunday Edition: November 25, 2007

Subprime Mortgage Crisis Growing
According to the Wall Street Journal yesterday, calculations by the Bank of America Corp. show that interest rates are set to rise on $362 billion worth of adjustable-rate subprime mortgages in 2008. Banc of America Securities, a unit of Bank of America, estimates that $85 billion in subprime mortgages will reset this quarter, another $85 billion will reset in the first quarter of 2008, and $101 billion of mortgages will reset in the second quarter of 2008. The estimates include loans packaged into securities and held in bank portfolios. In addition to the $362 billion of subprime ARMs that are scheduled to reset during 2008, Banc of America Securities said $152 billion in other loans with adjustable rates are scheduled to reset next year, including “jumbo” mortgages of more than $417,000 and Alt-A loans, a category between prime and subprime.

According to the Journal:

Many of the subprime mortgages that have driven up the default rate went bad in their first year or so, well before their interest rate had a chance to go higher… Now the real crest of the reset wave is coming, and that promises more pain for borrowers, lenders and Wall Street. Already, many subprime lenders, who focused on people with poor credit, have gone bust. Big banks and investors who made subprime loans or bought securities backed by them are reporting billions of dollars in losses… The reset peak will likely add to political pressure to help borrowers who can’t afford to pay the higher interest rates.

The Mortgage Bankers Association estimates that 1.35 million homes will enter the foreclosure process this year with another 1.44 million homes in 2008, up from 705,000 in 2005.

U.S. Recession May Harm Emerging Markets
London-based HSBC Asset Management told Reuters yesterday that an economic recession in the United States will affect emerging markets, even though some believe that decoupling from U.S. growth has taken place. Christian Deseglise, head of HSBC AM’s $85 billion global emerging markets business, told Reuters that the possibility of a U.S. recession was looking real now compared to earlier this year. Deseglise said:

Talk of recession in the US economy has increased lately so the story of decoupling from the US economy is being looked at more carefully … this may be causing the latest bout of nervousness. In February-March, there were fears but no evidence of slowdown. Now we are not dealing just with fears, but with something that is really out there. There are real issues with many sectors that may have a slowdown impact on the rest of the world.

Deseglise talked about the fallout from a U.S. recession:

If the US were to go down to one percent growth, emerging markets have the inner strength to grow within themselves. But if the US were to enter into a prolonged and severe recession that will have a detrimental effect. Emerging markets don’t need a fast growing US economy but they still need a growing US economy… I don’t think a recession is priced into the market.

HSBC Asset Management wouldn’t be the first to dispel the notion of decoupling from the United States. On November 2, I talked about how Stephen Roach, Chairman of Morgan Stanley Asia, told an audience in Mumbai, India, that he didn’t buy into the theory of decoupling:

I think the thing that worries me the most, and this is where I would really underscore the point for you in India, is that equity markets in this region, including your own, are discounting this optimistic, rosy scenario called decoupling. There is the strong belief that because the US has slowed so far, and Asia hasn’t, that any further slowdown will leave Asia unscathed. Think about it for a second. The slowing that’s occurred in the US right now has been in homebuilding activity. It’s America’s least global sector. You stop building a house in America, there’s almost no impact on Asian exports to the US. The slowing that will be coming over the next year will be in the consumer demand sector, which is America’s most global sector. So, we are going to see the US slowdown go from a domestically driven to a globally driven slowdown. I am sorry, as bullish as I am about Asia, Asia will not be an oasis of prosperity in a softer global demand climate. To the extent that emerging market equities are buyers of the global decoupling thesis, including in your own market right here, I think there could be a significant correction in emerging market equities that certainly could hit the Indian stock market quite hard.

Supporters of decoupling disagree. Reuters said:

Some observers say solid fiscal and monetary policy, healthy balance of payments, and China’s rise as a counterweight to the United States has helped emerging nations decouple from US growth and act as a safe haven from developed market turmoil.

In addition, they argue that the United States takes in just 16% of emerging market exports now, compared with 25% in 2001. In 2006, exports to other emerging nations overtook the volume of goods and services sent to developed nations.

Parting Shot
On the Euro Pacific Captial website, president and investment advisor Peter Schiff talked about how the actions of Wall Street and the U.S. government are forcing Gulf and Asian nations to reconsider their efforts in propping up the U.S. economy. In “Heads We Win, Tails You Lose” from November 23, Schiff said:

Perhaps the icing on this “let them eat cake” mentality was provided by Wall Street itself. In a year with record losses, Wall Street firms announced that they would also be paying record bonuses to their employees. The rationale for this PR fiasco was that since the losses were not the fault of the employees (really?), they should not be made to suffer. So rather than sharing the pain being endured by their firms’ shareholders (clearly even less culpable then themselves), Wall Street’s fat cats will rub salt in their owners’ wounds by compounding their losses with the additional expense of lavish bonuses. Following the outlandish pay packages already given to ousted CEO’s who clearly were responsible for the losses, Wall Street’s “heads we win, tails you lose” attitude will not go over well abroad.

Enjoy it while it lasts… which won’t be for much longer.

Have a wonderful week,

Christopher E. Hill
Editor
editor@boom2bust.com