Congress To ‘Bailout’ U.S. Automakers?
Looks like American automakers are next in line for a big payday. CNN Money’s Chris Isidore wrote this afternoon:
Plunging auto sales, high gas prices and election year politics could help convince Congress to approve a $50 billion loan package to embattled U.S. automakers that Detroit’s Big Three claim is key to their future success.
On Wednesday, General Motors, Ford Motor and Chrysler LLC reported monthly sales declines of at least 20% from a year ago, as American car buyers continued to turn away from SUVs and pickups and towards more fuel efficient car models.
The Big Three are now in the process of closing truck assembly lines and rushing to catch up with hybrid and other fuel efficient offerings from Toyota Motor and Honda Motor.
But with GM and Ford saddled with junk bond debt ratings and privately-held Chrysler with the thinnest capital cushion of the three, Detroit is caught in a credit squeeze that will make such investment difficult if not impossible…
Thus, the automakers have deployed what one industry official describes as a “surge” of lobbyists and executives at both the Democratic and Republican Party’s political conventions. The Big Three’s hope is that if they can win speedy passage of the loan package, they can move more quickly to retool their plants to produce more smaller cars.
The $50 billion loan package, first proposed by the auto industry last month, has won the support of presidential candidates Barack Obama and John McCain as their campaigns eye key votes in Michigan and Ohio.
The CNN Money senior writer spoke to David Cole, chairman of the Center for Automotive Research, about the prospect of low-interest federal loans and noted:
Cole and the automakers think winning the support for the loans will be easier now that Congress has moved to help mortgage finance giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac as well as home owners who borrowed more than they could afford on their mortgages.
Steven Pearlstein of the Washington Post also thinks the massive loan package, or “bailout,” as he refers to it, will go through. Pearlstein wrote yesterday:
So it should be no surprise that when Congress returns next week, the companies and their unions will put on a full-court press to win approval for $50 billion in federal loans to be used to re-engineer and retool their plants for a new generation of energy-efficient vehicles.
With the auto-dependent states of Michigan, Ohio and Indiana up for grabs in November, the Big Three hope to use the political calendar to their full advantage. They’ve already won the backing of both of the presidential candidates, along with House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, who promises quick action this fall. And while the White House has indicated its reluctance to involve the government in the rescue of yet another industry, it may have a hard time explaining why the automakers are any less deserving of a “bailout” than Wall Street investment banks or Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.
The question now is, who’s next?
Someone’s knockin’ at the door
somebody’s ringin’ the bell
Someone’s knockin’ at the door
Somebody’s ringin’ the bell
Do me a favor open the door and let ‘em in.-Wings, “Let ‘Em In” (1976)
Sources:
“Big Three bailout may be around corner”
Chris Isidore
CNN Money, September 4, 2008
“The Road to a Bailout They Don’t Deserve”
Steven Pearlstein
Washington Post, September 3, 2008







September 5th, 2008 at 8:57 am
So much for the Free Market.
Since the Automakers didn’t learn in the late ’70’s to look ahead, please explain why it is the taxpayer’s job to bail them out now that 30 years later they have once again been caught with their pants down while the price of gasoline spiked.
To answer your question - who’s next? - let’s look ahead another 15-20 years to when China is building airliners that cost 1/3 as much as a comparable Boeing. Now that they have outsourced so much of the building of their product to other manufacturers, the Chinese have a perfect opportunity to place corporate spies to learn the technology behind designing & building their product.
My experiences working with the Chinese has shown me that they are just as technically competent as we are. No surorise there - as when you throw aside the culture you will find that mostly, people are people no matter where they are from.
So that’s who you will find ‘knocking on the door’ in coming years.
————————–
Question: What do you call a dog with Wings?
Answer: Linds McCartney
This b!tch, along with Yoko, was responsible for breaking up the finest band of our generation. History will put the Beatles at the same level as the great composers of the past.
(Sorry, all you Rap singers, but you will be forgotten.)
September 5th, 2008 at 10:48 am
Exactly. The Fed and the US Treasury, by bailing out (or offering to) Bear and the GSE’s, have created a moral hazard that will exist for years to come. 5 years from now, a bank will call on the Fed for a bail out, claiming “well, you did it for Bear.” Admittedly, the circumstances surrounding the Bear Stearns bail out were economically dire, but nevertheless, the precedent has been set. Great post.
September 8th, 2008 at 8:37 am
Thanks for the comment Mammoth.
“…please explain why it is the taxpayer’s job to bail them out now that 30 years later they have once again been caught with their pants down while the price of gasoline spiked.”
From the Pearlstein piece:
September 8th, 2008 at 8:41 am
Thanks for the comment Rebecca. Glad you liked the post.
September 8th, 2008 at 12:46 pm
“…companies that for decades failed to produce cars that were well designed, well produced and exciting to look at…”
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Reading this made me think of my old 1967 Pontiac LeMans convertible, which I bought for $300 back in 1978 and drove for 13 years! Exciting to look at and reliable indeed – that magnificent machine racked up nearly 320,000 miles before some bozo clobbered it from behind.
No doubt that car would still be running today.
Thanks for the memories,
Mammoth
September 9th, 2008 at 6:19 am
I wonder if the Feds would loan me a $50,000 so that I can install solar energy system and finish building my home? I don’t think so, so should the Feds loan the auto industry $50 billion as a bailout with my tax dollars. Where is the Feds getting kind of money, I thought we were in debt of 35 trillion dollar with foreign country’s.
September 10th, 2008 at 8:52 am
Thanks for the comment Mammoth. They really built them to last back then, didn’t they? Up until a few years ago, my dad had in his possession a 1952 Chevy (with original engine and super-low miles on it), which ran beautifully. Not surprisingly, a car aficionado bought the vehicle to restore it to show-quality. I’m sure he’s getting plenty of enjoyment out of it…
September 10th, 2008 at 8:57 am
Thanks for the comment JSad.
“Where is the Feds getting kind of money, I thought we were in debt of 35 trillion dollar with foreign country’s.”
We are in debt, JSad. We’re just going more into debt…